Timeline for K3 Surfaces : Derivations and automorphisms
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2019 at 5:14 | comment | added | Binai | @Mohan It is pretty clear that the derivations should have this property related to the polynomial ideal that we are taking the quotient, but I want to know a characterization (if it exists). | |
| Dec 30, 2019 at 0:00 | answer | added | Devlin Mallory | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 29, 2019 at 15:57 | comment | added | Mohan | 1. is just given by the Euler sequence. They are just derivations of the polynomial ring (which are obvious) which takes the equation of the hypersurface to a multiple of the same equation. | |
| Dec 28, 2019 at 3:52 | comment | added | Binai | It was really bad written and it was missing an essential part of the data. Sorry for my mistake in not double checking it. I tried to clarify now... | |
| Dec 28, 2019 at 3:48 | history | edited | Binai | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 134 characters in body
|
| Dec 27, 2019 at 19:38 | comment | added | Sasha | @abx: "do not exist" means "=0". But the question is, indeed, quite unclear. | |
| Dec 27, 2019 at 17:20 | comment | added | abx | What do you call a derivation on a surface? If you mean a tangent vector field, they do not exist ($\neq 0$) on a K3. | |
| Dec 27, 2019 at 16:51 | history | asked | Binai | CC BY-SA 4.0 |