Skip to main content
added 247 characters in body
Source Link
Sylvain JULIEN
  • 7k
  • 3
  • 31
  • 66

Almost 5 years ago (time flies), I asked in Rankin-Selberg convolution and product of degrees whether the Rankin-Selberg convolution of two automorphic representations of respectively $\operatorname{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ and
$\operatorname{GL}_{n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ gave rise to an automorphic representation of $\operatorname{GL}_{n.n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$. Paul Garrett answered it by giving the known cases where this was proven at that time.

Have there been breakthroughs so far getting us any closer to such a general result?

Edit August 12th 2022: what about now? I would be especially interested in the case where the degree of the Rankin-Selberg convolution L-function is a prime power, that is $d_{F^{\otimes k}}=(d_{F})^{k}$ with $d_{F}\in\mathbb{P}$. A proof of this equality would entail that the following weakening of Goldbach's conjecture: "every composite even integer is the sum of 2 prime powers" implies that an L-function of composite even degree is a twist of a non primitive L-function.

Almost 5 years ago (time flies), I asked in Rankin-Selberg convolution and product of degrees whether the Rankin-Selberg convolution of two automorphic representations of respectively $\operatorname{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ and
$\operatorname{GL}_{n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ gave rise to an automorphic representation of $\operatorname{GL}_{n.n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$. Paul Garrett answered it by giving the known cases where this was proven at that time.

Have there been breakthroughs so far getting us any closer to such a general result?

Edit August 12th 2022: what about now? I would be especially interested in the case where the degree of the Rankin-Selberg convolution L-function is a prime power, that is $d_{F^{\otimes k}}=(d_{F})^{k}$ with $d_{F}\in\mathbb{P}$.

Almost 5 years ago (time flies), I asked in Rankin-Selberg convolution and product of degrees whether the Rankin-Selberg convolution of two automorphic representations of respectively $\operatorname{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ and
$\operatorname{GL}_{n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ gave rise to an automorphic representation of $\operatorname{GL}_{n.n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$. Paul Garrett answered it by giving the known cases where this was proven at that time.

Have there been breakthroughs so far getting us any closer to such a general result?

Edit August 12th 2022: what about now? I would be especially interested in the case where the degree of the Rankin-Selberg convolution L-function is a prime power, that is $d_{F^{\otimes k}}=(d_{F})^{k}$ with $d_{F}\in\mathbb{P}$. A proof of this equality would entail that the following weakening of Goldbach's conjecture: "every composite even integer is the sum of 2 prime powers" implies that an L-function of composite even degree is a twist of a non primitive L-function.

added 192 characters in body
Source Link
Sylvain JULIEN
  • 7k
  • 3
  • 31
  • 66

Almost 5 years ago (time flies), I asked in Rankin-Selberg convolution and product of degrees whether the Rankin-Selberg convolution of two automorphic representations of respectively $\operatorname{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ and
$\operatorname{GL}_{n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ gave rise to an automorphic representation of $\operatorname{GL}_{n.n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$. Paul Garrett answered it by giving the known cases where this was proven at that time.

Have there been breakthroughs so far getting us any closer to such a general result?

Edit August 12th 2022: what about now? I would be especially interested in the case where the degree of the Rankin-Selberg convolution L-function is a prime power, that is $d_{F^{\otimes k}}=(d_{F})^{k}$ with $d_{F}\in\mathbb{P}$.

Almost 5 years ago (time flies), I asked in Rankin-Selberg convolution and product of degrees whether the Rankin-Selberg convolution of two automorphic representations of respectively $\operatorname{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ and
$\operatorname{GL}_{n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ gave rise to an automorphic representation of $\operatorname{GL}_{n.n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$. Paul Garrett answered it by giving the known cases where this was proven at that time.

Have there been breakthroughs so far getting us any closer to such a general result?

Edit August 12th 2022: what about now?

Almost 5 years ago (time flies), I asked in Rankin-Selberg convolution and product of degrees whether the Rankin-Selberg convolution of two automorphic representations of respectively $\operatorname{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ and
$\operatorname{GL}_{n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ gave rise to an automorphic representation of $\operatorname{GL}_{n.n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$. Paul Garrett answered it by giving the known cases where this was proven at that time.

Have there been breakthroughs so far getting us any closer to such a general result?

Edit August 12th 2022: what about now? I would be especially interested in the case where the degree of the Rankin-Selberg convolution L-function is a prime power, that is $d_{F^{\otimes k}}=(d_{F})^{k}$ with $d_{F}\in\mathbb{P}$.

added 42 characters in body
Source Link
Sylvain JULIEN
  • 7k
  • 3
  • 31
  • 66

Almost 5 years ago (time flies), I asked in Rankin-Selberg convolution and product of degrees whether the Rankin-Selberg convolution of two automorphic representations of respectively $\operatorname{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ and
$\operatorname{GL}_{n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ gave rise to an automorphic representation of $\operatorname{GL}_{n.n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$. Paul Garrett answered it by giving the known cases where this was proven at that time.

Have there been breakthroughs so far getting us any closer to such a general result?

Edit August 12th 2022: what about now?

Almost 5 years ago (time flies), I asked in Rankin-Selberg convolution and product of degrees whether the Rankin-Selberg convolution of two automorphic representations of respectively $\operatorname{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ and
$\operatorname{GL}_{n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ gave rise to an automorphic representation of $\operatorname{GL}_{n.n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$. Paul Garrett answered it by giving the known cases where this was proven at that time.

Have there been breakthroughs so far getting us any closer to such a general result?

Almost 5 years ago (time flies), I asked in Rankin-Selberg convolution and product of degrees whether the Rankin-Selberg convolution of two automorphic representations of respectively $\operatorname{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ and
$\operatorname{GL}_{n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ gave rise to an automorphic representation of $\operatorname{GL}_{n.n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$. Paul Garrett answered it by giving the known cases where this was proven at that time.

Have there been breakthroughs so far getting us any closer to such a general result?

Edit August 12th 2022: what about now?

Source Link
Sylvain JULIEN
  • 7k
  • 3
  • 31
  • 66
Loading