Timeline for Transcription of a panel discussion about G.Perelman
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Sep 4, 2010 at 20:57 | comment | added | Sergei Tropanets | You call that discussion?! | |
| Sep 4, 2010 at 18:05 | answer | added | Unknown | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 8, 2010 at 8:43 | vote | accept | Unknown | ||
| Aug 7, 2010 at 16:06 | comment | added | Rasmus | The content of the video appears as pure sensation seeking. There is no mathematical content. | |
| Aug 7, 2010 at 15:05 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | @Unknown: Untrue, there are a lot of users on meta, and it's in general pretty active. Saturday and sunday on meta are sometimes pretty slow, but I couldn't have amassed 1200 posts on meta without it being active... | |
| Aug 7, 2010 at 14:46 | answer | added | VladAr | timeline score: 21 | |
| Aug 7, 2010 at 12:26 | comment | added | Rasmus | I don't see the point in asking if you are not waiting for the response. | |
| Aug 7, 2010 at 11:02 | comment | added | Unknown | I think there aren't many users on meta. So, it may mean waiting for a long time if only a few users are online. | |
| Aug 7, 2010 at 10:38 | comment | added | Rasmus | You didn't wait for a reply very long though. | |
| Aug 7, 2010 at 10:26 | comment | added | Unknown | I first asked on meta for its appropriateness: tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/586/… I still have no replies. So I am trying my luck here. | |
| Aug 7, 2010 at 10:22 | history | asked | Unknown | CC BY-SA 2.5 |