Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 20, 2019 at 13:57 vote accept abx
Dec 16, 2019 at 6:54 answer added abx timeline score: 9
Dec 14, 2019 at 18:34 comment added abx @EBz: $X=(\mathbb{P}^1)^n$, $\sigma =(\sigma _1,\ldots ,\sigma _n)$, where $\sigma _i$ is a nontrivial involution of $\mathbb{P}^1$.
Dec 14, 2019 at 10:09 answer added user108998 timeline score: 1
Dec 14, 2019 at 8:51 comment added user108998 Can anyone find examples realizing this bound of 2^dim? 2^2dim is easy to construct (abelian varieties)
Dec 13, 2019 at 18:31 history edited Olivier Benoist CC BY-SA 4.0
added 19 characters in body
Dec 12, 2019 at 20:01 comment added abx Yes, that's right, great! I should have thought of that... If you want to write it as an answer I will accept it.
Dec 12, 2019 at 19:33 comment added SashaP Doesn't the holomorphic Lefschetz fixed point formula imply that the number of fixed points has to be divisible by $2^{\dim X}$? On one hand, $\sum (-1)^i Tr(\sigma:H^i(O))$ is an integer because eigenvalues of an involution are $\pm 1$. On the other hand, for an isolated fixed point all the eigenvalues of the involution on the tangent space have to be equal to $-1$, so the local contribution of each fixed point is $1/\det(1-d\sigma)=1/2^{\dim X}$.
Dec 12, 2019 at 17:46 history became hot network question
Dec 12, 2019 at 17:25 comment added abx @Nick L: Right, thanks. In fact, in the case of a holomorphic involution (or automorphism of finite order) isolated fixed points are always non-degenerate.
Dec 12, 2019 at 16:42 comment added Nick L A very partial remark. A Kahler manifold with complex dimension $2n+1$ has even topological Euler characteristic by Hodge theory. So any diffeomorphism with non-degenerate fixed points has an even number of fixed points by the Lefschetz-Hopf formula (for an involution the Lefschetz number is equal to the Euler characteristic mod $2$).
Dec 12, 2019 at 11:00 comment added abx Yes, thanks! Of course this is what I had in mind, but I forgot to mention it. Edited.
Dec 12, 2019 at 11:00 history edited abx CC BY-SA 4.0
added 14 characters in body
Dec 12, 2019 at 10:29 answer added Francesco Polizzi timeline score: 7
Dec 12, 2019 at 10:28 comment added Francesco Polizzi By the way, you must assume $X$ irreducible, otherwise one can consider an involution over three points fixing just one of them.
Dec 12, 2019 at 10:07 comment added Francesco Polizzi $\mathbb{A}^1$ is not projective
Dec 12, 2019 at 10:05 comment added Jef This seems false: the involution $x \mapsto -x$ on $\mathbb{A}^1$ has exactly one fixed point.
Dec 12, 2019 at 9:42 history asked abx CC BY-SA 4.0