Timeline for Formula for a completely positive map
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 13, 2019 at 13:18 | comment | added | Arnold Neumaier | @NathanielJohnston: But if you go around a closed loop, do you get the same phases? | |
Dec 13, 2019 at 12:39 | comment | added | Nathaniel Johnston | @ArnoldNeumaier - The eigenvalues of $A$ and $B$ vary continuously with the entries of $A$ and $B$, and if those eigenvalues are distinct then so do the projections onto the eigenspaces, and thus their spectral decompositions, and thus the matrix $C$ (or $U$). Things get murky if you have repeated eigenvalues though. | |
Dec 13, 2019 at 10:31 | comment | added | Arnold Neumaier | @lcv:: It is not clear to me whether $U$ or $C$ can be chosen to be continuous. | |
Dec 13, 2019 at 10:26 | history | edited | Arnold Neumaier | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added a qualifying question
|
Dec 12, 2019 at 19:18 | comment | added | lcv | @nathanielJohnston yes I believe so. If he doesn't ask for the map to be trace preserving at least. | |
Dec 12, 2019 at 16:10 | comment | added | Nathaniel Johnston | @Icv - The same idea works even if $A$ and $B$ are just both positive definite with distinct eigenvalues. Then you can construct a matrix $C$ that sends the vectors in a spectral decomposition of $A$ to the vectors in a spectral decomposition of $B$, and the map $x \mapsto CxC^\dagger$ works. | |
Dec 11, 2019 at 16:48 | comment | added | lcv | For once, if $A$ and $B$ are iso-spectral (with distinct eigenvalues) such a map is $x \mapsto Ux U^\dagger$ where $ B=UAU^\dagger$ for some unitary $U$. | |
Dec 11, 2019 at 15:39 | history | asked | Arnold Neumaier | CC BY-SA 4.0 |