Timeline for The structure of $PSL_2$ over the p-adic integers
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 12, 2019 at 6:46 | comment | added | ayberkz | Thanks a lot. Any book/article suggestions for learning virtually pro-$p$ and $p$-adic analytic groups? @YCor: Is there an easy way to see why $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbf{Z}_p)$ doesn't split as a nontrivial free product/amalgam. | |
Dec 10, 2019 at 22:21 | comment | added | YCor | Well $PSL(2,\mathbf{Z}_p)$ itself is $p$-adic analytic but not pro-$p$ and the characterization is among pro-$p$-groups (which is fine since a $p$-adic analytic profinite group is virtually pro-$p$). | |
Dec 10, 2019 at 19:32 | comment | added | Ian Agol | Building on @YCor's comment, there is an abstract characterization of $p$-adic analytic groups (so the kernel $PSL(2,\mathbb{Z}_p)\to PSL(2,\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})$) as $p$-powerful groups. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powerful_p-group | |
Dec 10, 2019 at 12:46 | comment | added | YCor | It's a profinite, actually virtually pro-$p$ and $p$-adic analytic group, so reading about such topological groups might be helpful. Even as an abstract group, it doesn't split as a nontrivial free product or even amalgam. | |
Dec 10, 2019 at 12:15 | history | edited | LeechLattice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
PSL(2,Z_p) could mean PSL_2 on a finite field of p elements; edited to avoid confusion.
|
Dec 10, 2019 at 11:33 | history | edited | ayberkz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
Dec 10, 2019 at 11:23 | history | asked | ayberkz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |