Timeline for Learning roadmap for complex geometry
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2019 at 6:58 | comment | added | Nothing | @DeaneYang Thank you very much for the suggestion. | |
| Dec 6, 2019 at 19:38 | comment | added | Deane Yang | Since Griffiths-Harris takes an analytic approach, commutative algebra is not needed. There is some several complex variables needed, but you can wait until it's actually being used. And you can temporarily just accept the needed theorems as given. | |
| Dec 6, 2019 at 19:15 | answer | added | Piotr Achinger | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 6, 2019 at 17:06 | history | edited | Nothing | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 65 characters in body
|
| Dec 6, 2019 at 17:06 | comment | added | Nothing | @DeaneYang, I thought I will need several complex variables, commutative algebra etc to start reading it? | |
| Dec 6, 2019 at 16:10 | comment | added | Deane Yang | I agree with @abx. It looks like you have the foundations needed to start trying to read Griffiths and Harris. Ben McKay's recommendations below also look good. Look for one that heads in the direction you want and that you find easiest to read. | |
| Dec 6, 2019 at 15:24 | answer | added | Ben McKay | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 6, 2019 at 15:23 | answer | added | Ben McKay | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 6, 2019 at 15:22 | answer | added | Ben McKay | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 6, 2019 at 14:05 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 21, 2019 at 3:04 | |||||
| Dec 6, 2019 at 13:43 | comment | added | abx | I would recommend to start with Griffiths-Harris, which contains a lot of foundational material. If you happen to be blocked at some point you can always go back and find some appropriate reference. | |
| Dec 6, 2019 at 12:00 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 6, 2019 at 13:45 | |||||
| Dec 6, 2019 at 11:56 | history | asked | Nothing | CC BY-SA 4.0 |