Timeline for Properties of a general element of the intersection of two Schubert cycles
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 6, 2019 at 10:10 | comment | added | klerk | But I know for sure that $\Lambda$ belongs to $\Sigma_a \cap \Sigma_b$. Why does this must lie in $\Sigma_{\tilde{a}}\cap \Sigma_b$? If i take an element $[v] \in \mathbb{P}(V_{n-k+i-a_{i-1}})\cap \mathbb{P}(V_{n-i-b_{k-i}})$ it could be that an element of the fibre $\Lambda$ may lie in $\Sigma_a \setminus \Sigma_{\tilde{a}}$. Why does this cannot happen? Thank you for your help Libli. | |
Dec 6, 2019 at 8:30 | comment | added | Libli | This is by definition of transverse flags and the definition of Schubert cycles! | |
Dec 4, 2019 at 12:02 | comment | added | klerk | Why does the preimage of $$\mathbb{P}(V_{n-k+i-a_i-1}) \cap \mathbb{P}(W_{n-i-b_{k-i}}) \cup \mathbb{P}(V_{n-k+i-a_i}) \cap \mathbb{P}(W_{n-i-b_{k-i}-1})$$ in $\phi$ maps to $\Sigma_{\widetilde{a}} \cap \Sigma_b \cup \Sigma_{a} \cap \Sigma_{\widetilde{b}}$? To be more precise: let $[v] \in \mathbb{P}(V_{n-k+i-a_{i-1}}) \cap \mathbb{P}(V_{n-i-b_{k-i}})$, why does the preimage of this element consist of couples $(\Lambda, [v])$ with $\Lambda \in \Sigma_{\tilde{a}} \cap \Sigma_b$? | |
Dec 3, 2019 at 21:41 | history | answered | Libli | CC BY-SA 4.0 |