Skip to main content
added 231 characters in body
Source Link

I'm reading the Book of John Roe, Elliptic Operators, Topology and Asymptotic Methods and got stuck at Lemma 2.27.

i) How does this lemma show that a real vector bundle can be given by a pullback of direct sums of plane bundles?

ii) Assuming i) is clear, is this equation $\Pi_f(h^*E) = \prod_j g(p_1(P_j))$ then true for suitable real 2-plane bundles $P_j$ in which $h^*$ splits as direct sum?

iii) What happens in odd dimensions? Has it something to do with choosing $g(0)=1$?

I appreciate some literature or concise explaination. :)

EDIT: I've found a good reference [1]. Namely Proposition 11.2 together with Observation 11.8 gives a satisfying answer for me.

[1] H. Blaine Lawson and Marie-Louise Michelsohn. Spin Geometry.

I'm reading the Book of John Roe, Elliptic Operators, Topology and Asymptotic Methods and got stuck at Lemma 2.27.

i) How does this lemma show that a real vector bundle can be given by a pullback of direct sums of plane bundles?

ii) Assuming i) is clear, is this equation $\Pi_f(h^*E) = \prod_j g(p_1(P_j))$ then true for suitable real 2-plane bundles $P_j$ in which $h^*$ splits as direct sum?

iii) What happens in odd dimensions? Has it something to do with choosing $g(0)=1$?

I appreciate some literature or concise explaination. :)

I'm reading the Book of John Roe, Elliptic Operators, Topology and Asymptotic Methods and got stuck at Lemma 2.27.

i) How does this lemma show that a real vector bundle can be given by a pullback of direct sums of plane bundles?

ii) Assuming i) is clear, is this equation $\Pi_f(h^*E) = \prod_j g(p_1(P_j))$ then true for suitable real 2-plane bundles $P_j$ in which $h^*$ splits as direct sum?

iii) What happens in odd dimensions? Has it something to do with choosing $g(0)=1$?

I appreciate some literature or concise explaination. :)

EDIT: I've found a good reference [1]. Namely Proposition 11.2 together with Observation 11.8 gives a satisfying answer for me.

[1] H. Blaine Lawson and Marie-Louise Michelsohn. Spin Geometry.

deleted 39 characters in body
Source Link

I'm reading the Book of John Roe, Elliptic Operators, Topology and Asymptotic Methods and got stuck at Lemma 2.27.

i) How does this lemma show that a real vector bundle can be given by a pullback of direct sums of plane bundles?

ii) Assuming i) is clear, is this equation $\Pi_f(E) = h^* \prod_j g(p_1(P_j))$$\Pi_f(h^*E) = \prod_j g(p_1(P_j))$ then true for suitable real 2-plane bundles $P_j$ in which some vector bundle $E'$$h^*$ splits as direct sum such that $E=h^*E'$?

iii) What happens in odd dimensions? Has it something to do with choosing $g(0)=1$?

I appreciate some literature or concise explaination. :)

I'm reading the Book of John Roe, Elliptic Operators, Topology and Asymptotic Methods and got stuck at Lemma 2.27.

i) How does this lemma show that a real vector bundle can be given by a pullback of direct sums of plane bundles?

ii) Assuming i) is clear, is this equation $\Pi_f(E) = h^* \prod_j g(p_1(P_j))$ then true for suitable real 2-plane bundles $P_j$ in which some vector bundle $E'$ splits as direct sum such that $E=h^*E'$?

iii) What happens in odd dimensions? Has it something to do with choosing $g(0)=1$?

I appreciate some literature or concise explaination. :)

I'm reading the Book of John Roe, Elliptic Operators, Topology and Asymptotic Methods and got stuck at Lemma 2.27.

i) How does this lemma show that a real vector bundle can be given by a pullback of direct sums of plane bundles?

ii) Assuming i) is clear, is this equation $\Pi_f(h^*E) = \prod_j g(p_1(P_j))$ then true for suitable real 2-plane bundles $P_j$ in which $h^*$ splits as direct sum?

iii) What happens in odd dimensions? Has it something to do with choosing $g(0)=1$?

I appreciate some literature or concise explaination. :)

edited tags
Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286
added 79 characters in body; added 6 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 45 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading