Timeline for Constructing a very ample line bundle on a projective bundle
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 4, 2019 at 8:09 | history | edited | aglearner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 208 characters in body
|
Dec 4, 2019 at 8:08 | vote | accept | aglearner | ||
Dec 4, 2019 at 3:05 | answer | added | Mohan | timeline score: 4 | |
Dec 4, 2019 at 3:02 | comment | added | Sándor Kovács | @aglearner: I suppose Mohan meant to write $\mathbb CP^k\times X$, but possibly used his own macro for $\mathbb CP$ which the system did not recognize, and hence ignored... :) | |
Dec 3, 2019 at 23:19 | history | edited | aglearner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 211 characters in body
|
Dec 3, 2019 at 18:10 | comment | added | aglearner | Dear Mohan, thanks for this comment! You understand me correctly. But I am not familiar with the notation $Y=^k\times X$. Do you think you could write a complete answer? If you do, would you be so kind, please, to write an answer as an answer and not as a comment? | |
Dec 3, 2019 at 18:02 | comment | added | Mohan | If I understand you correctly, you are assuming $Y$ is algebraic and $p$ is a morphism in the category of algebraic varieties. Then, it is fairly easy to reduce to the case when $Y=\mathbb{}^k\times X$ and then the assertion is trivial. | |
Dec 3, 2019 at 16:46 | history | edited | aglearner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 866 characters in body
|
Dec 3, 2019 at 13:59 | history | edited | aglearner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
Dec 3, 2019 at 9:45 | history | edited | aglearner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Dec 3, 2019 at 9:35 | history | asked | aglearner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |