Timeline for Is Stoch enriched in Met?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2022 at 15:35 | history | edited | Paolo Perrone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 24, 2019 at 13:43 | history | edited | David Spivak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 24, 2019 at 12:10 | vote | accept | David Spivak | ||
| Nov 23, 2019 at 19:59 | history | edited | Paolo Perrone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected mistakes as pointed out by Martin Hairer in the comments.
|
| Nov 23, 2019 at 19:57 | comment | added | Paolo Perrone | @MartinHairer Thank you! Let me add the corrections. | |
| Nov 23, 2019 at 14:00 | comment | added | Martin Hairer | There are no infinite distances here, $d$ is bounded by $1$. (Your dual representation of TV is incorrect, you want $f \colon X \to [0,1]$.) Note also that the 'non-boring' case $d \neq 1$ is a fancy way of talking about Doeblin's condition which is 'rarely' verified 'in practice'. (Of course, maybe the OP has in mind some specific situation where it is relevant.) | |
| Nov 23, 2019 at 2:55 | history | edited | Paolo Perrone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2019 at 2:47 | history | edited | Paolo Perrone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2019 at 2:45 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 23, 2019 at 4:19 | |||||
| Nov 23, 2019 at 2:41 | history | answered | Paolo Perrone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |