Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 21, 2019 at 17:48 comment added M. Winter @TarasBanakh Your argument does not work if $x=y=p$ or if $K$ is empty. But I agree that the question should be modified to be interesting.
Nov 21, 2019 at 16:50 comment added Taras Banakh Such a set $K$ does not exist: Let $x=y$ be a point in $K$ on the largest possible distance from $p$. Then after a rotation $x=y$ cannot lie in the interior of $K$. This means that in order to avoid such a trivial answer, one should add that the points $x,y$ are different. But in this case there appear another trivial answer: $|K|\le 2$ or $K$ is a 3-element set consisting of the vertices of an equilateral triangle. So, which conditions on $x,y$ and $K$ should be imposed in order to make this quastion non-trivial?
Nov 21, 2019 at 14:10 comment added M. Winter I suppose you want to exclude the following sets for $K$: the empty set, a single point, two points. What about three points arranged in the shape of an equilateral triangle?
Nov 21, 2019 at 13:22 comment added Ramiro de la Vega @TarasBanakh It seems that if $K$, as in your example, has a unique point at maximal distance from the center then $K$ won’t satisfy the required property (take $x$ as that unique point and $y$ some other point on $\partial K$ ).
Nov 20, 2019 at 22:51 comment added burtonpeterj Can you elaborate on why?
Nov 20, 2019 at 22:09 comment added Taras Banakh What about the set $K=\{(x,y):(x+1)^2+y^2\le 4\}\cap\{(x,y):(x-1)^2+y^2\le 4\}$ and point $p=(0,\sqrt{3})$? It seems that $K$ has the required property.
Nov 20, 2019 at 21:51 history edited burtonpeterj CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 67 characters in body
Nov 20, 2019 at 21:15 history asked burtonpeterj CC BY-SA 4.0