Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 26, 2019 at 17:56 comment added LSpice Calling a category $\operatorname{CRing}$ $\operatorname{CRing}$ is a good idea, but calling a category $\operatorname C$ $\operatorname C$ (rather than just $C$ $C$) probably isn't. Also, use MathJax *MathJax* rather than $\textit{math-mode fakery}$ $\textit{math-mode fakery}$ for italics.
Nov 26, 2019 at 17:55 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
$\textit{full}$ -> *full*, and other TeX fixes
Nov 19, 2019 at 9:05 comment added sagirot Thanks everybody for your comments and answers. Since I am quite new here, I was not really aware of the difference between MSE and MO. Now I am aware and yes this is certainly a MSE question.
Nov 19, 2019 at 8:58 vote accept sagirot
Nov 19, 2019 at 2:17 comment added Kevin Carlson To me, this clearly belongs at MSE.
Nov 18, 2019 at 21:29 comment added David Roberts I think this a reasonable question, though amenable to answering by simple examples as shown by Spencer below. As such it's borderline for MO. However, I would have phrased it as: is the forgetful functor $c/C \to C$ full? In particular, a ring may (in principle) have more than one algebra structure, and so you don't have a subcategory. Here's a more interesting question: when is $c/C\to C$ full?
Nov 18, 2019 at 20:30 review Close votes
Dec 3, 2019 at 3:05
Nov 18, 2019 at 19:56 answer added Spencer Dembner timeline score: 3
Nov 18, 2019 at 18:51 history asked sagirot CC BY-SA 4.0