Timeline for Geometric meaning of Koszul modules
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 14, 2019 at 0:35 | comment | added | mkemeny | These two conditions are basically the same in our setting, see the top of page 8 of arxiv.org/pdf/1408.4164.pdf | |
Dec 12, 2019 at 23:57 | comment | added | Li Li | @mkemeny But those propositions induce that $L$ does not satisfy $N_p$(in fact $N_{p-1}$ in my situation). This doesn't imply the nonvanishment of $K_{p,2}$, right? | |
Nov 24, 2019 at 4:00 | comment | added | mkemeny | Hi ! This is a result from Koh-Stillman's paper "Linear Syzygies and Line Bundles on an Algebraic Curve", see Prop. 3.6. You can also look at Chapter 4.4 of Aprodu-Nagel's book "Koszul Cohomology and Algebraic Geometry", in particular Theorem 4.36. | |
Nov 17, 2019 at 17:47 | comment | added | meh | You will have to do some digging yourself, but there is a paper of Green and Lazarsfeld in which they show how to construct non-zero Koszul cohomology classes from points in special position w.r.t a line bundle. 'not p+1 very ample' means that there are p+1 points in special position relative to L. The construction of the class is explicit and imho, geometric. Happy hunting. | |
S Nov 17, 2019 at 16:58 | history | suggested | ABIM |
More tags for more outreach.
|
|
Nov 17, 2019 at 16:57 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Nov 17, 2019 at 16:58 | |||||
Nov 17, 2019 at 16:49 | history | edited | Amir Sagiv | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Link and formatting
|
Nov 17, 2019 at 16:45 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 17, 2019 at 16:49 | |||||
Nov 17, 2019 at 16:43 | history | asked | Li Li | CC BY-SA 4.0 |