Timeline for Arzela-Ascoli for L_p-norm
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2019 at 10:28 | vote | accept | ctst | ||
| Nov 18, 2019 at 10:25 | vote | accept | ctst | ||
| Nov 18, 2019 at 10:27 | |||||
| Nov 18, 2019 at 10:25 | vote | accept | ctst | ||
| Nov 18, 2019 at 10:25 | |||||
| Nov 18, 2019 at 10:25 | vote | accept | ctst | ||
| Nov 18, 2019 at 10:25 | |||||
| Nov 15, 2019 at 15:26 | answer | added | mlk | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 15, 2019 at 8:26 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Nov 15, 2019 at 1:29 | history | edited | ctst | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
changed the question to the box, so that it is more reasonable and more what I actually wanted
|
| Nov 15, 2019 at 1:20 | comment | added | ctst | In my setting I actually want the derivatives to converge, so practically yes (my spaces are compact). I just recognized that I might have asked the wrong question in the box by trying to make it more understandable. In the box should be that the $f_n$ are piecewise differentiable and the derivatives of $f_n$ converge in $L_p$ norm. I assume it is now too late to change that? | |
| Nov 15, 2019 at 0:57 | comment | added | Nik Weaver | No way, e.g. consider $f_n(x) = \sin(nx)$ on $[0,2\pi]$. But Arzela-Ascoli has an equicontinuity assumption, do you have anything like that? | |
| Nov 15, 2019 at 0:53 | answer | added | Pietro Majer | timeline score: 9 | |
| Nov 15, 2019 at 0:30 | history | edited | ctst | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo
|
| Nov 15, 2019 at 0:23 | history | asked | ctst | CC BY-SA 4.0 |