Timeline for Comparison of hitting probability of two Markov chains both with only one absorbing state version 3
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S May 22, 2020 at 6:55 | history | suggested | Hans | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected the reference to the formula.
|
May 22, 2020 at 3:38 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 22, 2020 at 6:55 | |||||
May 21, 2020 at 20:22 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @Hans : I'll have that new question in mind. However, at this point I don't have good ideas about it. | |
May 21, 2020 at 17:39 | comment | added | Hans | Hi, Iosif: Would you terribly mind taking a look at my new question mathoverflow.net/q/360554/32660? Thank you! | |
Nov 14, 2019 at 14:50 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | I am glad you found the remark helpful. The updated notations do seem easier to grasp. | |
Nov 14, 2019 at 4:37 | comment | added | Hans | Thank you for adding the remark showing the details of the derivation. That is really helpful. I have edited the notations in the question as you suggested. Hope you like it. | |
Nov 13, 2019 at 13:54 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 850 characters in body
|
Nov 13, 2019 at 9:35 | vote | accept | Hans | ||
Nov 13, 2019 at 9:35 | comment | added | Hans | I am trying to make the Markov chain admit time inhomogeneity. But admittedly, I could have just used $p_{i,j}(t)$ making it dependent on time $t$. Thank you, Iosif. | |
Nov 13, 2019 at 4:03 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @Hans : I had misunderstood one of your conditions (I find your notations hard to grasp -- actually, you only need $P$ and $Q$ and a few words). Anyhow, the conjecture still fails to hold. You can actually do all this testing/calculations yourself, with the tools provided in my answer to the previous version of your question, at mathoverflow.net/questions/345450/… . | |
Nov 13, 2019 at 3:54 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 192 characters in body
|
Nov 13, 2019 at 2:16 | comment | added | Hans | Why are $0=p_{3,5}<q_{3,5}=1$ and $p_{4,2}=q_{4,2}=1$, with the first inequality violates the premise more severely than the second? | |
Nov 12, 2019 at 16:35 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 159 characters in body
|
Nov 12, 2019 at 15:35 | history | answered | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |