Timeline for Reversal of open cover with topologically transitive dynamical system
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 31, 2019 at 10:17 | vote | accept | ABIM | ||
Oct 31, 2019 at 8:09 | answer | added | Ilkka Törmä | timeline score: 3 | |
Oct 30, 2019 at 16:38 | comment | added | ABIM | Thanks you Willie; I'll do the same. | |
Oct 30, 2019 at 16:37 | comment | added | Willie Wong | (Deleted a bunch of comments since they have been clarified and now there are no obvious counterexamples.) | |
Oct 30, 2019 at 16:33 | history | edited | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
Oct 30, 2019 at 16:26 | history | edited | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
Oct 30, 2019 at 16:23 | comment | added | YCor | Are you assuming that $\nu$ is finite? at least locally? | |
Oct 30, 2019 at 16:16 | history | edited | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 202 characters in body
|
Oct 30, 2019 at 16:13 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed capitals from title, removed tag
|
Oct 30, 2019 at 16:10 | history | edited | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 247 characters in body
|
Oct 30, 2019 at 15:47 | comment | added | Willie Wong | Do you require $V_i$ to be distinct? If not, since the existence of a solution implies $(V, N_i)_i$ is a solution, and if $(V, N_i)_i$ is allowed to be a solution, why not just ignore $V_i$ and work only with $V$? | |
Oct 30, 2019 at 15:44 | history | edited | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
Oct 30, 2019 at 15:30 | history | edited | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 20 characters in body
|
Oct 30, 2019 at 15:25 | comment | added | Ilkka Törmä | If a solution $(V_i, N_i)_i$ exists, then $(V, N_i)_i$ is also a solution, so $\delta_1$ is unimportant. Is this intentional? | |
Oct 30, 2019 at 15:16 | history | asked | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |