Timeline for A finite alternating sum
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 1, 2019 at 23:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Nov 2, 2019 at 9:37 | |||||
Oct 30, 2019 at 16:24 | comment | added | esg | For $j=0$ the equality $\sum_{n\geq 0}n^j t^j=\frac{t A_j(t)}{(1-t)^{j+1}}$ uses the convention $0^0:=0$. With $0^0:=1$ you arrive at Fedor Petrov's result. | |
Oct 30, 2019 at 7:45 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | You do not actually need Euler polynomials: for fixed $n$ we get $\sum_j (-e)^{-j}n^j t^j/j!=\exp(-nt/e)$, then summing by $n$ we have $\sum_n \exp(-nt/e)t^n=\sum_n (t\exp(-t/e))^n=1/(1-t\exp(-t/e))$, hm, this slightly differs from yours formula. Let's check the coefficients of $t^0$. | |
Oct 30, 2019 at 5:29 | vote | accept | Francisco | ||
Oct 30, 2019 at 5:28 | vote | accept | Francisco | ||
Oct 30, 2019 at 5:28 | |||||
Oct 30, 2019 at 5:27 | comment | added | Francisco | Thank you! I was not familiarized with Eulerian polynomials. I really enjoyed learning about this and the approach. | |
Oct 28, 2019 at 0:52 | history | edited | WhatsUp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 357 characters in body
|
Oct 28, 2019 at 0:46 | history | edited | WhatsUp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 357 characters in body
|
Oct 28, 2019 at 0:40 | history | edited | WhatsUp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 357 characters in body
|
Oct 28, 2019 at 0:29 | history | edited | WhatsUp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 357 characters in body
|
Oct 28, 2019 at 0:22 | history | edited | WhatsUp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 357 characters in body
|
Oct 27, 2019 at 23:59 | history | answered | WhatsUp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |