Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Oct 28, 2019 at 8:16 history edited ueir CC BY-SA 4.0
eraborate
Oct 27, 2019 at 14:28 history edited ueir CC BY-SA 4.0
fix error
Oct 27, 2019 at 14:22 vote accept ueir
Oct 27, 2019 at 13:43 history edited ueir CC BY-SA 4.0
fix error
Oct 27, 2019 at 9:30 comment added Alexey Ustinov Partial products of the form $(x-1)(x-2)...(x-k)$ have coefficients from oeis.org/A265165. This page refers to the article hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01236582v4/document where Theorem 7 gives some Supercongruences. Probably it will answer the question.
Oct 27, 2019 at 9:18 answer added Fedor Petrov timeline score: 6
Oct 27, 2019 at 8:27 history edited ueir CC BY-SA 4.0
add explanation
Oct 27, 2019 at 8:21 history edited ueir CC BY-SA 4.0
add explanation
Oct 27, 2019 at 7:53 history edited ueir CC BY-SA 4.0
..
Oct 27, 2019 at 7:45 history edited ueir CC BY-SA 4.0
add explanation
Oct 27, 2019 at 3:26 comment added ueir I'm sorry for unclear question. I'll fix this. Thank you.
Oct 27, 2019 at 3:09 comment added WhatsUp @AlexeyUstinov I have posted some clarification as an answer. Perhaps you'll be interested now.
Oct 27, 2019 at 3:08 answer added WhatsUp timeline score: 4
Oct 27, 2019 at 2:09 comment added Alexey Ustinov The element $\phi\in\mathbb{F}_p(\sqrt5)$ is a linear combination of $1$ and $\sqrt 5$ with coefficients modulo $p$. So the product $(\phi-1)(\phi-2)...(\phi-p)$ is not well defined modulo $p^2$. You can replace $\phi$ by $\phi+tp$ with $t\in\mathbb{F}_p(\sqrt5)$ and it still be a root of $x^2=x+1\mod p.$
Oct 27, 2019 at 1:37 history edited Alexey Ustinov CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Oct 27, 2019 at 0:24 history asked ueir CC BY-SA 4.0