Skip to main content

Timeline for Dehn and the Jordan curve theorem

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 25, 2023 at 11:47 history edited coudy CC BY-SA 4.0
Edited link
Aug 30, 2022 at 9:10 history edited Sam Nead
edited tags
Aug 30, 2022 at 7:48 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 4.0
added a Wayback Machine link for the dead link
Aug 30, 2022 at 1:28 history edited Sam Nead
edited tags
Aug 18, 2020 at 18:36 comment added Timothy Chow But Hales addresses this in Section 4.2. Jordan never claims that the segments of a polygon cannot intersect. He (initially) allows the segments of the polygon to intersect, and page 93 of his proof describes a finite process of removing small loops from the polygon to make it simple.
Aug 18, 2020 at 18:33 comment added Timothy Chow At the time Hales wrote his paper, he was unaware of Guggenheimer's paper. I asked Hales about this. He said Guggenheimer had two objections. The first was that Jordan didn't prove the theorem for polygons. Hales discusses this point in his paper. The second objection (p 194) was, "What is missing is a proof that for a Jordan curve $x(t)$, $0\le t \le 1$, and $\delta>0$ there is an $\epsilon_0$ such that the segments $x(t_i) x(t_{i+1}), x(t_j) x(t_{j+1})$ of a polygon of vertices $x(t_0),\ldots,x(t_N)$ cannot intersect if $t_{k+1}-t_k<\epsilon\le\epsilon_0$ and $|x(t_{j+1})-x(t_i)| <\delta$."
Oct 23, 2019 at 20:23 comment added Timothy Chow Not directly relevant, but Hales has championed the view that Jordan's original proof was correct. mizar.org/trybulec65/4.pdf
Oct 23, 2019 at 15:49 comment added John Stillwell To clarify, Dehn's proof is for the polygonal Jordan curve theorem. He was interested in deriving it from a small subset of Hilbert's axioms for geometry.
Oct 23, 2019 at 11:47 comment added Sam Nead The Briscoe center is at UT Austin. Try contacting a mathematician who works there; eg Cameron Gordon?
Oct 23, 2019 at 10:43 history asked coudy CC BY-SA 4.0