If an analytic geometric structure is rigid in the sense of Gromov (see Gromov and d'Ambra), its symmetry vector fields form a finite dimensional Lie algebra. This is not very helpful, since we don't know too many different ways to prove rigidity, but there are lots of examples in:

MR1144526 (93d:58117) Reviewed D'Ambra, G.(F-IHES); Gromov, M.(I-CAGL) Lectures on transformation groups: geometry and dynamics. Surveys in differential geometry (Cambridge, MA, 1990), 19–111, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA, 1991.

For example, if a structure (for example, a pseudo-Riemannian metric) induces an affine connection (for example, the Levi--Civita connection), then it is rigid, and its Lie algebra of symmetry vector fields is finite dimensional. Similarly for a projective connection, or (in dimension 3 or more) for a conformal connection.

If an analytic geometric structure is rigid in the sense of Gromov (see Gromov and d'Ambra), its symmetry vector fields form a finite dimensional Lie algebra. This is not very helpful, since we don't know too many different ways to prove rigidity, but there are lots of examples in:

D'Ambra, G.(F-IHES); Gromov, M.(I-CAGL) Lectures on transformation groups: geometry and dynamics. Surveys in differential geometry (Cambridge, MA, 1990), 19–111, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA, 1991.

For example, if a structure (for example, a pseudo-Riemannian metric) induces an affine connection (for example, the Levi--Civita connection), then it is rigid, and its Lie algebra of symmetry vector fields is finite dimensional. Similarly for a projective connection, or (in dimension 3 or more) for a conformal connection.

You could also look at:

M. Gromov, Rigid transformations groups, in Géométrie Différentielle (Paris, 1986), Hermann, 1988.

A. M. Amores, Vector fields of a finite type G-structure, J. Diff. Geom., 1979.

R. Quiroga-Barranco; A. Candel, Rigid and finite type geometric structures. Geom. Dedicata 106 (2004), 123–143.

R. Zimmer, Ergodic theory and the automorphism group of a $G$-structure, in Group representations, ergodic theory, operator algebras, and mathematical physics (Berkeley, Calif., 1984), 1987.

The paper of Quiroga-Barranco and Candel explains how to prove rigidity of many types of geometric structures, including Cartan geometries modelled on effective homogeneous spaces, so including pseudo-Riemannian geometries, affine connections, conformal connections in dimension 3 or more, and projective connections in dimensions 2 or more.

If an analytic geometric structure is rigid in the sense of Gromov (see Gromov and d'Ambra), its symmetry vector fields form a finite dimensional Lie algebra. This is not very helpful, since we don't know too many different ways to prove rigidity, but there are lots of examples in:

MR1144526 (93d:58117) Reviewed D'Ambra, G.(F-IHES); Gromov, M.(I-CAGL) Lectures on transformation groups: geometry and dynamics. Surveys in differential geometry (Cambridge, MA, 1990), 19–111, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA, 1991.

If an analytic geometric structure is rigid in the sense of Gromov (see Gromov and d'Ambra), its symmetry vector fields form a finite dimensional Lie algebra. This is not very helpful, since we don't know too many different ways to prove rigidity, but there are lots of examples in:

MR1144526 (93d:58117) Reviewed D'Ambra, G.(F-IHES); Gromov, M.(I-CAGL) Lectures on transformation groups: geometry and dynamics. Surveys in differential geometry (Cambridge, MA, 1990), 19–111, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA, 1991.

For example, if a structure (for example, a pseudo-Riemannian metric) induces an affine connection (for example, the Levi--Civita connection), then it is rigid, and its Lie algebra of symmetry vector fields is finite dimensional. Similarly for a projective connection, or (in dimension 3 or more) for a conformal connection.