Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 15, 2019 at 13:22 answer added Geoff Robinson timeline score: 4
Oct 14, 2019 at 22:20 review Close votes
Oct 31, 2019 at 3:05
Oct 14, 2019 at 18:48 comment added Derek Holt Geoff Robinson has said already in a previous comment that $k(U) = |G:N_G(U)|$ is false in general. In just computed another example. When $n=p=3$, we have $k(U)=11$ and $|G:N_G(U)| = 52$.
Oct 14, 2019 at 18:44 comment added Nourr Mga The number of commuting pairs in $U$ is $|U|k(U)$. I want to know if $k(U)=[G:N_{G}(U)]$ or not. More precisely, is the number of commuting pairs in $U$ is $|U|.[G:N_{G}(U)]$?.
Oct 14, 2019 at 18:31 history edited Martin Sleziak
Removed the deprecated (abstract-algebra) tag - see the tag info: https://mathoverflow.net/tags/abstract-algebra/info (if there are some other suitable tags, choose them instead.)
Oct 14, 2019 at 18:19 comment added Nourr Mga Yes thanks. But which of the two options is correct to compute the number of commuting pairs in U.
Oct 14, 2019 at 18:08 comment added Geoff Robinson OK, but when $n = 2$, we have $[G:N_{G}(U)] = p+1,$ while $k(U) = p$, so the first option (with "it" $=N_{G}(U)$) does not hold for $n = 2$ (and for lots of other cases).
Oct 14, 2019 at 17:39 comment added Nourr Mga Thank you sir. I mean in the first option that $k(U)=[G:N_{G}(U)]$ which is easy to calculate.
Oct 14, 2019 at 17:29 comment added Geoff Robinson The second option does not give a precise formula for $k(U)$. But, as far as I know, Higman's conjecture is still open, as seems clear from the linked paper. As for the first option, do you mean to ask whether $[G:U] = k(U)$ or whether $[G:B] = k(U)$, where $B = N_{G}(U)$? When $n = 2$, neither of these options seems to hold, since $k(U) \leq |U|$ and $[G:B] > |U|$, so I am a little unclear what you mean to ask.
Oct 14, 2019 at 17:20 history asked Nourr Mga CC BY-SA 4.0