Timeline for A question about the Tannaka-Krein reconstruction of finite groups
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Oct 12, 2019 at 22:26 | comment | added | BWW | The issue is to construct a fibre functor. | |
Oct 12, 2019 at 22:25 | comment | added | BWW | You also need duals. | |
Oct 11, 2019 at 23:06 | answer | added | Joshua Grochow | timeline score: 6 | |
Oct 11, 2019 at 22:33 | history | became hot network question | |||
Oct 11, 2019 at 18:05 | vote | accept | Zhaoting Wei | ||
Oct 11, 2019 at 15:33 | answer | added | Noah Snyder | timeline score: 8 | |
Oct 11, 2019 at 14:43 | comment | added | Zhaoting Wei | @DenisT. That's right but it doesn't solve my problem: is there any difference on $\text{Aut}^{\otimes}(F)$ if we only consider $\text{rep}_{\mathbb{C}}(G)$ as a monoidal category? | |
Oct 11, 2019 at 14:35 | comment | added | Denis T | Easy example is the category of graded vector spaces which is monoidally isomorphic to vector spaces, but not symmetrically. | |
Oct 11, 2019 at 14:28 | comment | added | Denis T | Being symmetric is not a property but a structure on monoidal category specifying the commutativity isomorphism and you implicitly assumed that it is a "standard one". | |
Oct 11, 2019 at 13:50 | history | asked | Zhaoting Wei | CC BY-SA 4.0 |