Timeline for Usefulness of Nash embedding theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2022 at 13:18 | history | edited | Igor Khavkine | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added DOI links.
|
| Oct 7, 2019 at 14:48 | comment | added | Piotr Hajlasz | @EttoreMinguzzi I added more details showing that the space does not depend on the embedding. | |
| Oct 7, 2019 at 14:48 | history | edited | Piotr Hajlasz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 746 characters in body
|
| Oct 7, 2019 at 13:33 | comment | added | Ettore Minguzzi | Thank you for the answer and reference. Is the space $W^{1,p}(M,N)$ dependent on just $N$, or does it also depend on the embedding of $N$ into $\mathbb{R}^\nu$? From what I get from the equation in display I would say the latter. I that case wouldn't be the notation $W^{1,p}(M,N)$ a sort of abuse of notation? | |
| Oct 7, 2019 at 12:54 | history | answered | Piotr Hajlasz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |