Timeline for Usefulness of Nash embedding theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Oct 7, 2019 at 3:23 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | @MattF. To be fair, it seemed to me that the original question also asked/allowed for negative answers: "If not can you explain why Nash theorem is less useful and powerful than expected?" | |
| Oct 7, 2019 at 1:21 | history | edited | Zurab Silagadze | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
a doubtfull link removed
|
| Oct 6, 2019 at 21:25 | comment | added | user44143 | The quote is nice but it doesn’t answer the question. Saying that Nash’s theorem is not part of Riemannian geometry, not much to do with classical PDE, and shows no significant influence of the geometry on the imbeddings — all that does not suggest why the theorem is useful in a positive sense. | |
| Oct 6, 2019 at 21:05 | history | edited | Zurab Silagadze | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
A link changed
|
| Oct 6, 2019 at 20:59 | history | answered | Zurab Silagadze | CC BY-SA 4.0 |