Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 27, 2022 at 15:57 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 4.0
http -> https (the question was bumped anyway)
Feb 3, 2022 at 14:32 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Links to book and article while this is on the front page
Aug 2, 2010 at 23:31 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by S. Carnahan
Aug 2, 2010 at 23:13 comment added Will Jagy Thanks, Donu. I fiddled with it. As to Jim's question, it would appear Scott C knows something. As Anweshi mentioned Moonshine, perhaps Richard Borcherds can think of something fitting to say. Mostly, I would be disappointed that we put in this much effort to rehabilitate the question if we then got few substantial responses.
Aug 2, 2010 at 22:48 comment added Donu Arapura Jim: Of course, you are asking a better version of the question which I hope someone (who knows more than me) can answer. Will: Feel free to add/modify whatever you see fit.
Aug 2, 2010 at 22:31 comment added Will Jagy Donu, I recommend putting (in the question ) the quote from Kevin Lin about not hastily closing, plus the explicit link to the Aschbacher pdf, I can do that if you are not sure how.
Aug 2, 2010 at 22:21 comment added Jim Humphreys The current version of the question asks for applications outside finite group theory, so I guess this qualifies. But probably the more interesting question is where the classification has impact on mathematics outside group theory. This is a tricky question, since some of the sporadic groups (notably the Monster) seem to have life beyond conventional group theory as do some of the groups of Lie type. But the great achievement of the classification beyond extending the list of known groups is (or will be) the proof that no others can exist. Does that have wider application?
Aug 2, 2010 at 21:46 history answered Donu Arapura CC BY-SA 2.5