Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 4, 2019 at 15:38 answer added shehryar sikander timeline score: 0
Aug 2, 2010 at 19:09 vote accept Samuel Monnier
Aug 2, 2010 at 19:09 comment added Samuel Monnier Thanks to all, and especially to Emerton for taking the time to explain in detail the construction of equivariant bundles. It turns out that the classification result I was after is contained in Andy's paper (with some mild restrictions on the genus and level structure). Thanks again!
Aug 2, 2010 at 17:49 answer added Barbara timeline score: 6
Aug 2, 2010 at 16:42 comment added Donu Arapura OK, thanks I'll take a look at your paper.
Aug 2, 2010 at 16:39 comment added Andy Putman @Donu : see my answer below.
Aug 2, 2010 at 16:37 comment added Donu Arapura Modulo torsion my guess about $Pic(A_g)$ ought to follow from Borel's "Stable real cohomology of arithmetic groups". If anyone knows anything more precise, please let me know.
Aug 2, 2010 at 16:34 answer added Andy Putman timeline score: 7
Aug 2, 2010 at 16:24 comment added Donu Arapura A small correction: the period domain is usually the thing you take the quotient of -- in this case the Siegel's upper half plane $H_g$. But otherwise yes, Siegel modular form should correspond to sections of line bundles on $A_g = H_g/Sp(2g, Z)$. I would image that $Pic(A_g)=Z$ for g large enough. I notice that Emerton has given some references. There may be something more classical also, although I don't have anything specific in mind. You could start with Birkenhake and Lange's book on complex abelian varieties for example.
Aug 2, 2010 at 16:10 answer added Emerton timeline score: 10
Aug 2, 2010 at 15:13 history edited Samuel Monnier CC BY-SA 2.5
deleted 225 characters in body
Aug 2, 2010 at 15:00 history asked Samuel Monnier CC BY-SA 2.5