Timeline for Anti-diagonal matrix operator
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 26, 2019 at 16:47 | history | edited | YCor |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
Sep 26, 2019 at 15:08 | answer | added | Jochen Glueck | timeline score: 3 | |
Sep 26, 2019 at 12:30 | comment | added | Malik Amine | yeah exactly thank you that's what I meant. (The diagonal case is direct) | |
Sep 26, 2019 at 12:27 | history | edited | Malik Amine | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Sep 26, 2019 at 12:16 | comment | added | Jochen Glueck | I seems to me that your matrix is diagonal rather than anti-diagonal (as suggested in the title). Do you mean $\mathcal{A} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & A \\ A & 0 \end{pmatrix}$? | |
Sep 26, 2019 at 11:55 | review | First posts | |||
Sep 26, 2019 at 11:56 | |||||
Sep 26, 2019 at 11:53 | history | asked | Malik Amine | CC BY-SA 4.0 |