Skip to main content
added 482 characters in body
Source Link
Halbort
  • 1.1k
  • 1
  • 7
  • 20

I have a distribution $\mathcal{D}$ that spits out vectors in $\{-1, 1\}^N$. Suppose I have a sample of $H$ of these vectors which I arrange into a matrix $M$ of the form $H \times N$.

Consider the eigenvalues of $\frac{MM^T}{NH}$. Note that each row sum is at most $1$. Thus, the maximum eigenvalue is at most $1$.

Is there some way of defining a measure of complexity of $\mathcal{D}$ that lets me say with high probability the maximum eigenvalue is only $\varepsilon$ away from 1? Hopefully the lower the complexity, the closer it is to one. However, increasing $N$ should bring it closer to 1.

EDIT--------------------------------------------------- I found an interesting result. For graph matrices, the largest eigenvalue is less than $\frac{(k-1)n}{k}$ where $k$ is the chromatic number. If we divide by $N$ like in my problem, we do have a way of tying the complexity to the largest eigenvalue. This upper bound comes closer to $1$ as complexity increases. However, I want to show that with high probability, the eigenvalue comes close to one not just an upper bound.

I have a distribution $\mathcal{D}$ that spits out vectors in $\{-1, 1\}^N$. Suppose I have a sample of $H$ of these vectors which I arrange into a matrix $M$ of the form $H \times N$.

Consider the eigenvalues of $\frac{MM^T}{NH}$. Note that each row sum is at most $1$. Thus, the maximum eigenvalue is at most $1$.

Is there some way of defining a measure of complexity of $\mathcal{D}$ that lets me say with high probability the maximum eigenvalue is only $\varepsilon$ away from 1? Hopefully the lower the complexity, the closer it is to one. However, increasing $N$ should bring it closer to 1.

I have a distribution $\mathcal{D}$ that spits out vectors in $\{-1, 1\}^N$. Suppose I have a sample of $H$ of these vectors which I arrange into a matrix $M$ of the form $H \times N$.

Consider the eigenvalues of $\frac{MM^T}{NH}$. Note that each row sum is at most $1$. Thus, the maximum eigenvalue is at most $1$.

Is there some way of defining a measure of complexity of $\mathcal{D}$ that lets me say with high probability the maximum eigenvalue is only $\varepsilon$ away from 1? Hopefully the lower the complexity, the closer it is to one. However, increasing $N$ should bring it closer to 1.

EDIT--------------------------------------------------- I found an interesting result. For graph matrices, the largest eigenvalue is less than $\frac{(k-1)n}{k}$ where $k$ is the chromatic number. If we divide by $N$ like in my problem, we do have a way of tying the complexity to the largest eigenvalue. This upper bound comes closer to $1$ as complexity increases. However, I want to show that with high probability, the eigenvalue comes close to one not just an upper bound.

edited tags
Link
LeechLattice
  • 9.5k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 57
removed capitals, added tags
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Probabilistic Lower Boundlower bound on Largest Singular Valuelargest singular value of Matricesmatrices

I have a distribution $\mathcal{D}$ that spits out vectors in $\{-1, 1\}^N$. Suppose I have a sample of $H$ of these vectors which I arrange into a matrix $M$ of the form $H \times N$.

Consider the eigenvalues of $\frac{MM^T}{NH}$. Note that each row sum is at most $1$. Thus, the maximum eigenvalue is at most $1$.

Is there some way of defining a measure of complexity of $\mathcal{D}$ that lets me say with high probability the maximum eigenvalue is only $\epsilon$$\varepsilon$ away from 1.? Hopefully the lower the complexity, the closer it is to one. However, Increasingincreasing $N$ should bring it closer to 1.

Probabilistic Lower Bound on Largest Singular Value of Matrices

I have a distribution $\mathcal{D}$ that spits out vectors in $\{-1, 1\}^N$. Suppose I have a sample of $H$ of these vectors which I arrange into a matrix $M$ of the form $H \times N$.

Consider the eigenvalues of $\frac{MM^T}{NH}$. Note that each row sum is at most $1$. Thus, the maximum eigenvalue is at most $1$.

Is there some way of defining a measure of complexity of $\mathcal{D}$ that lets me say with high probability the maximum eigenvalue is only $\epsilon$ away from 1. Hopefully the lower the complexity, the closer it is to one. However, Increasing $N$ should bring it closer to 1.

Probabilistic lower bound on largest singular value of matrices

I have a distribution $\mathcal{D}$ that spits out vectors in $\{-1, 1\}^N$. Suppose I have a sample of $H$ of these vectors which I arrange into a matrix $M$ of the form $H \times N$.

Consider the eigenvalues of $\frac{MM^T}{NH}$. Note that each row sum is at most $1$. Thus, the maximum eigenvalue is at most $1$.

Is there some way of defining a measure of complexity of $\mathcal{D}$ that lets me say with high probability the maximum eigenvalue is only $\varepsilon$ away from 1? Hopefully the lower the complexity, the closer it is to one. However, increasing $N$ should bring it closer to 1.

added 122 characters in body
Source Link
Halbort
  • 1.1k
  • 1
  • 7
  • 20
Loading
Source Link
Halbort
  • 1.1k
  • 1
  • 7
  • 20
Loading