Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
It is actually an old conjecture of Erdős, Mollin, and Walsh that the pattern you have noticed does indeed go on forever, i.e., there are no three consecutive powerful numberspowerful numbers.
It is actually an old conjecture of Erdős, Mollin, and Walsh that the pattern you have noticed does indeed go on forever, i.e., there are no three consecutive powerful numbers.
It is actually an old conjecture of Erdős, Mollin, and Walsh that the pattern you have noticed does indeed go on forever, i.e., there are no three consecutive powerful numbers.
It is actually an old conjecture of Erdős, Mollin, and Walsh that the pattern you uavehave noticed does indeed go on forever, i.e., there are no three consecutive powerful numbers.
It is actually an old conjecture of Erdős, Mollin, and Walsh that the pattern you uave noticed does indeed go on forever, i.e., there are no three consecutive powerful numbers.
It is actually an old conjecture of Erdős, Mollin, and Walsh that the pattern you have noticed does indeed go on forever, i.e., there are no three consecutive powerful numbers.
It is actually an old conjecture of Erdős, Mollin, and Walsh that the pattern you uave noticed does indeed go on forever, i.e., there are no three consecutive powerful numbers.
