Timeline for Combinatorial equation system with exponentially many equations in quadratic many variables
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2020 at 23:54 | history | edited | Mario Krenn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor
|
| Apr 22, 2020 at 8:56 | history | edited | Mario Krenn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 25 characters in body
|
| Apr 21, 2020 at 8:30 | comment | added | Mario Krenn | @ZachTeitler Thanks for your comment, i updated the question now, improved the notation according to your suggestion, thank you! Also added the n=4,c=2 example following exactly the notation used here. Does that help? | |
| Apr 21, 2020 at 8:29 | history | edited | Mario Krenn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1801 characters in body
|
| S Apr 20, 2020 at 19:04 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Apr 20, 2020 at 19:04 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 20, 2020 at 17:27 | comment | added | Alex Ravsky | @ZachTeitler Your understanding of variables notation is correct. An example of a full system (for $n=4$ and $c=2$) on which you ask is provided in this question. | |
| Apr 20, 2020 at 7:31 | comment | added | Zach Teitler | ... I don't completely understand why you need $\omega_{X_i,X_j,x_i,x_j}$. Could you just write $\omega_{i,j}$ and have the same information? Or not? I'm sorry to ask such stupid questions, but I just find the notation confusing. Would you be willing to write out the full system of equations for a small case, say $n=c=2$? | |
| Apr 20, 2020 at 7:29 | comment | added | Zach Teitler | The notation is strange. If I said $X_i$ is a variable, and $\omega_{X_i}$ is a variable, then literally what that means is that for each value of $X_i$, I have a separate variable $\omega_{X_i}$. If $X_i = 5$, then there is a variable $\omega_5$. If $X_i = -3$, then there is a variable $\omega_{-3}$. This cannot possibly be what you intended. If you clarify this, I think the whole question might be easier to read. Also: Please consider summing over $\sigma \in S_n$, the symmetric group, and writing $\sigma(j)$ instead of $P^{(m)}(j)$. ... | |
| Apr 19, 2020 at 13:49 | answer | added | Alex Ravsky | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Apr 12, 2020 at 17:57 | history | bounty started | Mario Krenn | ||
| S Apr 12, 2020 at 17:57 | history | notice added | Mario Krenn | Draw attention | |
| Oct 10, 2019 at 1:55 | history | undeleted | Mario Krenn | ||
| Oct 10, 2019 at 1:52 | history | deleted | Mario Krenn | via Vote | |
| Oct 10, 2019 at 1:52 | history | undeleted | Mario Krenn | ||
| Oct 10, 2019 at 1:51 | history | deleted | Mario Krenn | via Vote | |
| Sep 19, 2019 at 22:12 | history | edited | Mario Krenn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 121 characters in body
|
| Sep 19, 2019 at 4:04 | history | edited | Mario Krenn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 19, 2019 at 3:58 | history | asked | Mario Krenn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |