Timeline for On the Dirichlet series for $1/\zeta(s)$ for real $s$ and the zeros of zeta
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 8, 2019 at 6:04 | history | edited | Ali Taghavi |
edited tags
|
|
Sep 19, 2019 at 5:37 | comment | added | reuns | See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_series#Abscissa_of_convergence if $\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{a(n)}{n^{s_0}}$ converges then $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{a(n)}{n^s}= \lim_{N\to \infty} N^{s_0-s} (\sum_{n=1}^N a(n) n^{-s_0}) + \sum_{n=1}^{N-1} (\sum_{m=1}^n a(m)m^{-s_0}) (n^{s_0-s}-(n+1)^{s_0-s})$$ converges and is analytic for $\Re(s) > \Re(s_0)$ and where it is meromorphic it has no poles on $\Re(s_0)$. The converse is very specific to $\zeta(s)$ and follows from the same Tauberian theorems as in the proof of the PNT. | |
Sep 18, 2019 at 23:15 | history | rollback | Yemon Choi |
Rollback to Revision 2
|
|
S Sep 18, 2019 at 22:41 | history | suggested | user142929 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Feel free to reject my edit: improved minor aspects of the post and added the tags (analytic-continuation) and (dirichlet-series)
|
Sep 18, 2019 at 21:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Sep 18, 2019 at 22:41 | |||||
Sep 18, 2019 at 17:29 | answer | added | Wojowu | timeline score: 7 | |
Sep 18, 2019 at 17:04 | answer | added | David E Speyer | timeline score: 3 | |
Sep 18, 2019 at 15:36 | comment | added | Conrad | where did you hear that? | |
Sep 18, 2019 at 14:40 | review | Close votes | |||
Sep 30, 2019 at 3:05 | |||||
Sep 18, 2019 at 14:17 | history | edited | Rafik1 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
Sep 18, 2019 at 14:15 | review | First posts | |||
Sep 18, 2019 at 15:12 | |||||
Sep 18, 2019 at 14:11 | history | asked | Rafik1 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |