Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 27, 2011 at 16:49 comment added Ryan Reich @darij: $S_n$ may be more basic, but $\operatorname{GL}_n$ is (to me) more transparent. I can see the structure: it contains $S_n$; it gives me examples of unipotent and solvable groups too; there's also a nice description (over $\mathbb{C}$) of the conjugacy classes. Also, of course, it reminds me of highest-weight theory for representations of reductive groups (even better than $\operatorname{SL}_n$, which is not fully reductive). I find the last one rather useful because of personal bias. Not as close to the axioms, maybe, but richer.
Oct 27, 2011 at 15:44 comment added darij grinberg I can't believe somebody finds $\mathrm{GL}_n$ or dihedral groups more basic than $S_n$.
Jun 20, 2011 at 19:41 comment added Mariano Suárez-Álvarez @Sean: $sl_2$ is deceptively simple... I would say that $sl_3$ is a more representative example.
Nov 11, 2010 at 1:53 comment added Sean Tilson I especially like sl_2 for lie algebra. I remember being amazed at how the representation theory of $sl_2$ gives you a good model to go about classifying all finite dimensional simple lie algebra over $\mathbb{C}$
Jan 8, 2010 at 14:39 history edited user1073 CC BY-SA 2.5
added 11 characters in body
Nov 6, 2009 at 13:43 vote accept John D. Cook
Oct 30, 2009 at 6:29 history answered Myron Minn-Thu-Aye CC BY-SA 2.5