Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 18, 2019 at 1:30 history edited RobPratt CC BY-SA 4.0
tightened formulation
Sep 14, 2019 at 20:15 comment added Aaron Meyerowitz From your first list (left hand side) I see that 24 appears with every other number except $1,2,22,23.$ (That was one eyeballing of the answer so I might be off a bit.) To find $70$ lists for the right hand side which mesh with these would require (along with much more) $24$ partitions of $70$ using just $1,22,23,24.$ That won’t work with just a single $1$. If there is a solution it would need an abundance of multiple lists (vertices) on each side with exactly the same members (neighbors on the other side).
Sep 14, 2019 at 1:15 comment added user44143 Can you show the lists of vertices?
Sep 14, 2019 at 0:33 history edited RobPratt CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body
Sep 14, 2019 at 0:26 comment added RobPratt Updated just now and will rerun the solver.
Sep 14, 2019 at 0:25 history edited RobPratt CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 215 characters in body
Sep 14, 2019 at 0:15 comment added Ilya Bogdanov Notice that you can use the same partition of $70$ several times (for several vertices in one part); so I do not understand why you put $x_i\in\{0,1\}$. Moreover, by these reasons, the second half of your inequalities should be more complicated.
Sep 13, 2019 at 14:54 history edited RobPratt CC BY-SA 4.0
added 233 characters in body
Sep 13, 2019 at 3:50 comment added RobPratt Not yet, just proposing a formulation that captures the problem.
Sep 13, 2019 at 3:43 comment added Brendan McKay I'm puzzled. Did you find a solution?
Sep 13, 2019 at 3:09 history edited RobPratt CC BY-SA 4.0
added 674 characters in body
Sep 12, 2019 at 21:42 comment added RobPratt I am using SAS.
Sep 12, 2019 at 20:28 comment added dvitek @RobPratt What software are you using to do the integer linear programming?
Sep 12, 2019 at 18:27 vote accept Chain Markov
Sep 13, 2019 at 6:32
Sep 12, 2019 at 6:15 comment added Brendan McKay Yes, that should do it.
Sep 12, 2019 at 4:40 comment added RobPratt Hmm, I guess after the edits to @dvitek's answer we need two such sets of partitions, with no pair of parts appearing together on both sides?
Sep 12, 2019 at 4:29 comment added Brendan McKay I see the 70 partitions corresponding to the vertices on one side of the $K_{70,70}$, but I don't see how to make a partition of $K_{70,70}$ out of them.
Sep 12, 2019 at 3:41 history answered RobPratt CC BY-SA 4.0