Timeline for Mapping of subcubes of a $(d+k)$-hypercube onto subcubes of a $d$-hypercube
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2020 at 23:28 | vote | accept | Evgeny Kuznetsov | ||
| May 5, 2020 at 23:28 | comment | added | Evgeny Kuznetsov | Oh, I misread the "corresponding bit". I understood it as "first bit", I don't know why. Now I see what happens there completely. Sorry it was already clear that we can set $p=1$ without lose of generality. | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 21:52 | history | edited | Ilya Bogdanov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 13 characters in body; added 67 characters in body
|
| Apr 29, 2020 at 21:51 | comment | added | Ilya Bogdanov | If you speak on part 1; I somehow forgot to mention that wlog $p=1$. Is it clearer now? (will change the answer right now) | |
| Apr 25, 2020 at 17:35 | comment | added | Evgeny Kuznetsov | Thank you for the answer and sorry, I somehow missed it. I read it now and, I can not see yet why should $f(z)$ have $0$ on first bit, in case $z$ has first bit determined. | |
| Sep 12, 2019 at 19:33 | history | edited | Ilya Bogdanov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 11, 2019 at 20:25 | history | answered | Ilya Bogdanov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |