Timeline for Borromean Lines of three $\mathbb{R}^1$ in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and analogous Milnor link invariants
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Sep 12, 2019 at 3:02 | comment | added | Steven Stadnicki | Thank you - the comment is very helpful! Note that just like in the Hopf case, you'll likely need to use two copies of $\mathbb{R}^1$ for each circle, so you may want to talk about six copies of $\mathbb{R}^1$, not three... | |
S Sep 11, 2019 at 21:19 | history | suggested | user34104 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
A comment added in the end.
|
Sep 11, 2019 at 21:19 | comment | added | user34104 | @StevenStadnicki Thanks! A comment is added in the end, which explains what we mean by $R^1$ lines forming a Hopf link. The question is then about an analogous version for Borromean ring. | |
Sep 11, 2019 at 21:16 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Sep 11, 2019 at 21:19 | |||||
Sep 11, 2019 at 20:47 | comment | added | Steven Stadnicki | I'm maybe missing something, but there are no obstructions that would limit three mutually nonintersecting, mutually non-parallel $\mathbb{R}^1$ lines from winding up in any configuration whatsoever, so there's no way of distinguishing 'linked' from 'unlinked' lines in a way that would be invariant even under linear transformations. | |
Sep 11, 2019 at 18:45 | history | edited | annie marie cœur | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 71 characters in body
|
Sep 11, 2019 at 18:28 | history | asked | annie marie cœur | CC BY-SA 4.0 |