Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 27, 2020 at 19:12 vote accept user43263
Sep 13, 2019 at 20:34 comment added Willie Wong If you have identified some specific journals, I would suggest just emailing the editors and ask whether what you have in mind is on topic.
Sep 13, 2019 at 8:42 comment added user43263 Or are there any "hidden" things that I have to keep in mind, that they don't mention in the Information for Notices Authors section (such as, e.g., one has to be a member of the AMS to have the article accepts, or to be already well-known research)?
Sep 13, 2019 at 8:40 comment added user43263 @MyNinthAccount @ WillieWong Perhaps the AMS Notices is also a good places? Following various links that were mentioned I ended up at ams.org/publications/notices/noticesauthors which mentions that it publishes "articles that report on major new developments in mathematics" among many other different types of articles. Because it allows such a variety of articles, perhaps this might be the best places to try to submit. Can anyone confirm if this is a good idea?
Sep 13, 2019 at 8:30 comment added user43263 @WillieWong You are right that it is broader than "just conjectures" (that was a bit off hand from myself). The AMJ seems to fit in with what I have in mind in terms of interdisciplinarity and informal understanding, but less in terms that articles should "'unhide' the process of mathematical discovery". So it seems that a concrete result or problem should be at the core of the article, where as in my case it's general vision of where something might be moving towards. This does seem to be outside the scope of the journal, since there is no "unhiding" of the research process to be done.
Sep 11, 2019 at 21:21 history became hot network question
Sep 11, 2019 at 18:28 comment added MyNinthAccount Usually "vision papers" are more likely to appear as conference proceedings than in a journal. Even authors with high gravitas/status tend to go this route.
Sep 11, 2019 at 17:42 comment added Praphulla Koushik @WillieWong I mean mathoverflow.net/questions/307619/…
Sep 11, 2019 at 14:10 comment added Fred Rohrer Not answering your question about journals, but rather the question in the title: According to Récoltes et Semailles, Grothendieck considers his Pursuing Stacks as some sort of "vision paper" or, as he calls it, a "rêve éveillé".
Sep 11, 2019 at 13:55 comment added Praphulla Koushik @WillieWong No, not that.. the question I am trying to remember is not about conjectures.. It is about results that authors claim to have proof but as a "trailer of a movie" they release a paper that gives main results in the upcoming paper...
Sep 11, 2019 at 13:41 comment added Willie Wong @user43263: did you look at the Aim/Scope of the Arnold Math Journal I mentioned? I think it is somewhat broader than "just conjectures".
Sep 11, 2019 at 13:33 answer added Carlo Beenakker timeline score: 5
Sep 11, 2019 at 13:27 comment added user43263 @WillieWong This journal only allows conjectures; I'm looking for something a bit broader than that, something where a vision for a field can be presented (this is related to automated theorem proving), which is not necessarily tied to some concrete open problems.
Sep 11, 2019 at 13:25 history edited user43263 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 187 characters in body; edited title
Sep 11, 2019 at 13:18 comment added Willie Wong @PraphullaKoushik: I wonder if you are thinking about mathoverflow.net/questions/268482/publishing-conjectures ? From an answer there, maybe Arnold Math Journal is what is sought.
Sep 11, 2019 at 13:15 history edited user43263 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 609 characters in body
Sep 11, 2019 at 13:11 comment added Praphulla Koushik I remember seeing a relevant question in this site...
Sep 11, 2019 at 13:07 history asked user43263 CC BY-SA 4.0