Timeline for Maps between grassmannians with inclusion property
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 24, 2019 at 13:56 | comment | added | LSpice | I agree with your correction; thanks. Actually it's a good thing, since the version without conjugation would have been holomorphic, hence contradicted @abx's nice answer. | |
Aug 24, 2019 at 13:54 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Edited to reflect @AliTaghavi's correction
|
Aug 24, 2019 at 5:00 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | I unaccept the answer since you asked me so. but i still believe it can be revised . | |
Aug 24, 2019 at 4:47 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | I do not see why it is wrong. Every fixed point free map $f$ works. you can revise it. i think we need conjugation too $\bar{b}, -\bar{a},\bar{d}, -\bar{c}$. Yes?any way your effort really helped me. Am I mistaken to think that your $f$ can be revised?any way should I un-accept(after all)? | |
Aug 24, 2019 at 3:20 | comment | added | LSpice | @AliTaghavi, this answer is wrong (sorry!). Please un-accept it so that I can delete it. | |
Aug 24, 2019 at 3:20 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | Very interesting!what about the opposit direction? | |
Aug 24, 2019 at 3:19 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
This answer is wrong
|
Aug 24, 2019 at 3:17 | vote | accept | Ali Taghavi | ||
Aug 24, 2019 at 4:49 | |||||
Aug 24, 2019 at 3:13 | history | answered | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |