Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 4, 2019 at 12:37 comment added Đào Thanh Oai @LSpice there is level of research I check by my computer 178 hours mathoverflow.net/questions/339813/…
Aug 24, 2019 at 11:04 comment added Đào Thanh Oai I will research this conjecture with $\epsilon > 0$.
Aug 24, 2019 at 5:47 vote accept Đào Thanh Oai
Aug 24, 2019 at 5:47 comment added Đào Thanh Oai @YemonChoi Thank You, I Learn from experience
Aug 24, 2019 at 5:31 history closed LSpice
Yemon Choi
Ivan Izmestiev
abx
Felipe Voloch
Not suitable for this site
Aug 24, 2019 at 3:26 comment added Yemon Choi I'm voting to close this question for the reasons indicated by @LSpice
Aug 23, 2019 at 19:46 comment added J. E. Pascoe There are four counterexamples with $a \leq b < 10000.$ These were appended to my answer in a comment. The code I wrote is obviously unoptimized, (as it took about an hour to finish) so calculating all examples less than a billion would require actual thought.
Aug 23, 2019 at 19:10 comment added J. E. Pascoe Not that I want to encourage naive conjecture here, but it seems to me that the conjecture seems to correspond to taking $\varepsilon = 0$ in the $abc$-conjecture, but correspondingly weakening the conclusion to be about the smallest number involved rather than the largest. So far, the Mathematica program I have been running has produced one other example with $a,b< 10000,$ which is $(1024,1377).$ Its possible there may be only finitely many counterexamples, but much like the $abc$-conjecture itself, I see no reason why.
Aug 23, 2019 at 19:05 review Close votes
Aug 24, 2019 at 5:35
Aug 23, 2019 at 19:03 comment added Robin Zhang In line with the counterexample given by Pascoe, looking for differences and sums of large powers of small primes that only have a few distinct small prime factors probably gives many counterexamples.
Aug 23, 2019 at 18:54 comment added J. E. Pascoe @LSpice, to be fair, it is true when $a, b \leq 1000.$
Aug 23, 2019 at 18:50 comment added LSpice Setting aside the fact that a counterexample was produced in an hour, surely MO is not the place to test conjectures that trivially imply FLT. It seems to me that, for such a conjecture, you need to provide some serious evidence that it might be correct before expecting other people to spend time on it.
Aug 23, 2019 at 18:49 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
TeX and proofreading
Aug 23, 2019 at 18:42 answer added J. E. Pascoe timeline score: 10
Aug 23, 2019 at 18:20 comment added hookah What you have in mind seems related to abc-conjecture, one of whose consequences is Fermat's last theorem. See here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abc_conjecture
Aug 23, 2019 at 17:40 history asked Đào Thanh Oai CC BY-SA 4.0