Timeline for Hochschild (co)homology of A and of Mod_A
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2011 at 4:11 | comment | added | Aaron Bergman | Presumably you're taking derived tensor products in the endofunctor category, but I'm not sure of a reference. It must be in Lurie or Ben-Zvi-Francis-Nadler. | |
| Apr 5, 2011 at 22:57 | comment | added | Kevin H. Lin | This is the answer for cohomology. What is the corresponding answer for homology? | |
| Jul 31, 2010 at 13:17 | comment | added | Aaron Bergman | The latter. It'e Lemma 9.1.3 of Weibel, for example. | |
| Jul 31, 2010 at 5:17 | comment | added | Sean Tilson | are the bar resolution and hochschild complex really the same? i thought that the differentials were a little different. One is a simplicial set and the other is cyclic. Or are you only using the bar resolution to compute the ext group? | |
| Jul 31, 2010 at 0:04 | comment | added | Kevin H. Lin | Very nice. It seems like everything is answered very nicely by Toen's Morita theory. | |
| Jul 30, 2010 at 23:31 | vote | accept | Kevin H. Lin | ||
| Jul 30, 2010 at 3:33 | history | answered | Aaron Bergman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |