Timeline for Analog of the Lie Product formula for commutators
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2019 at 6:43 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add Chorin et al.
|
| Oct 9, 2019 at 6:25 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add Cohn
|
| Oct 9, 2019 at 6:13 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
| Oct 9, 2019 at 6:07 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add Gluškov
|
| Oct 7, 2019 at 4:17 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add Goto, Yamabe
|
| Aug 25, 2019 at 13:15 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 146 characters in body
|
| Aug 21, 2019 at 12:44 | history | edited | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 747 characters in body
|
| Aug 14, 2019 at 2:01 | comment | added | LSpice | Indeed, it's almost using the informal idea "we can compute $e^{u[X, Y]}$ for infinitesimal $u$" to compute $e^{u[X, Y]}$ for standard $u$. (Maybe some NSA can make this precise, but, at least as a conceptual explanation, it makes sense to me.) | |
| Aug 14, 2019 at 1:49 | history | answered | Francois Ziegler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |