Timeline for Simple trace formula with different spectral footprint?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2020 at 15:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 25, 2020 at 15:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 28, 2019 at 14:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 28, 2019 at 13:43 | answer | added | user146515 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 14, 2019 at 12:51 | comment | added | Spencer Leslie | I agree! the case I was thinking of was the self-associate $GL(2)\times GL(2)$ Levi in $GL(4)$, but the rank two case would also be clarifying. | |
| Aug 13, 2019 at 21:25 | comment | added | paul garrett | Just as with cuspidal-data Eisenstein series, inducing from (super-) cuspidal data on the Levi component of a parabolic produces a repn with no non-zero homs to induced reps from any other parabolics except those containing the "associates" of the given one. So using (super-) cuspidal data on a maximal proper parabolic, perhaps self-associate and associate to nothing else, would be interesting. E.g., all the maximal proper parabolics in Sp4 (=4x4 matrices) have this feature. | |
| Aug 13, 2019 at 20:39 | history | asked | Spencer Leslie | CC BY-SA 4.0 |