Skip to main content

Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space and $\alpha$ be a homeomorphism of $X$.

So we have a natural action of $\mathbb{Z}$ on $C(X)$ which generates the cross product algebra $C^*(X,\alpha)$. [It is well known that this algebra is simple if and only if the dynamical system $(X,\alpha)$ is a minimal dynamical system, see corollaryCorollary VIII.3.9 of page 229 of the book C*$C^*$ Algebras by examples by Kenneth R. Davidson, "https://books.google.com/books?id=0TXteNfrzvcC&lpg=PA223&vq=minimal%20dynamical%20system&pg=PA229&output=embed" width=500 height=500)

Is there a precise example of a dynamical system whose minimality is not easy to proofprove but the symplicity simplicity of corresponding algebra is accessible and easy to investigationinvestigate?

Is there an example of a dynamical system with a finite number of minimal components whosesuch that the number of minimal components can be precisely observed in the corresponding cross product algebra?

Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space and $\alpha$ be a homeomorphism of $X$.

So we have a natural action of $\mathbb{Z}$ on $C(X)$ which generates the cross product algebra $C^*(X,\alpha)$. [It is well known that this algebra is simple if and only if the dynamical system $(X,\alpha)$ is a minimal dynamical system, see corollary VIII.3.9 of page 229 of the book C* Algebras by examples by Kenneth R. Davidson, "https://books.google.com/books?id=0TXteNfrzvcC&lpg=PA223&vq=minimal%20dynamical%20system&pg=PA229&output=embed" width=500 height=500)

Is there a precise example of a dynamical system whose minimality is not easy to proof but the symplicity of corresponding algebra is accessible and easy to investigation?

Is there an example of a dynamical system with a finite number of minimal components whose number of minimal components can be precisely observed in the corresponding cross product algebra?

Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space and $\alpha$ be a homeomorphism of $X$.

So we have a natural action of $\mathbb{Z}$ on $C(X)$ which generates the cross product algebra $C^*(X,\alpha)$. [It is well known that this algebra is simple if and only if the dynamical system $(X,\alpha)$ is a minimal dynamical system, see Corollary VIII.3.9 of page 229 of the book $C^*$ Algebras by examples by Kenneth R. Davidson, "https://books.google.com/books?id=0TXteNfrzvcC&lpg=PA223&vq=minimal%20dynamical%20system&pg=PA229&output=embed")

Is there a precise example of a dynamical system whose minimality is not easy to prove but the simplicity of corresponding algebra is accessible and easy to investigate?

Is there an example of a dynamical system with a finite number of minimal components such that the number of minimal components can be precisely observed in the corresponding cross product algebra?

deleted 16 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space and $\alpha$ be a homeomorphism of $X$.

So we have a natural action of $\mathbb{Z}$ on $C(X)$ which generates the cross product algebra $C^*(X,\alpha)$. [It is well known that this algebra is simple if and only if the dynamical system It is well known that this algebra is simple if and only if the dynamical system $(X,\alpha)$ is a minimal dynamical system, see corollary VIII.3.8 of page 229 of this book.$(X,\alpha)$ is a minimal dynamical system, see corollary VIII.3.9 of page 229 of the book C* Algebras by examples by Kenneth R. Davidson, "https://books.google.com/books?id=0TXteNfrzvcC&lpg=PA223&vq=minimal%20dynamical%20system&pg=PA229&output=embed" width=500 height=500)

Is there a precise example of a dynamical system whose minimality is not easy to proof but the symplicity of corresponding algebra is accessible and easy to investigation?

Is there an example of a dynamical system with a finite number of minimal components whose number of minimal components can be precisely observed in the corresponding cross product algebra?

Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space and $\alpha$ be a homeomorphism of $X$.

So we have a natural action of $\mathbb{Z}$ on $C(X)$ which generates the cross product algebra $C^*(X,\alpha)$. It is well known that this algebra is simple if and only if the dynamical system $(X,\alpha)$ is a minimal dynamical system, see corollary VIII.3.8 of page 229 of this book.

Is there a precise example of a dynamical system whose minimality is not easy to proof but the symplicity of corresponding algebra is accessible and easy to investigation?

Is there an example of a dynamical system with a finite number of minimal components whose number of minimal components can be precisely observed in the corresponding cross product algebra?

Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space and $\alpha$ be a homeomorphism of $X$.

So we have a natural action of $\mathbb{Z}$ on $C(X)$ which generates the cross product algebra $C^*(X,\alpha)$. [It is well known that this algebra is simple if and only if the dynamical system $(X,\alpha)$ is a minimal dynamical system, see corollary VIII.3.9 of page 229 of the book C* Algebras by examples by Kenneth R. Davidson, "https://books.google.com/books?id=0TXteNfrzvcC&lpg=PA223&vq=minimal%20dynamical%20system&pg=PA229&output=embed" width=500 height=500)

Is there a precise example of a dynamical system whose minimality is not easy to proof but the symplicity of corresponding algebra is accessible and easy to investigation?

Is there an example of a dynamical system with a finite number of minimal components whose number of minimal components can be precisely observed in the corresponding cross product algebra?

edited title
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

The number of minimal componentcomponents of a dynamical system via certain invariants of corresponding cross product $C^*$ algebra, some precise examples

Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space and $\alpha$ be a homeomorphism of $X$.

So we have a natural action of $\mathbb{Z}$ on $C(X)$ which generates the cross product algebra $C^*(X,\alpha)$. ThisIt is well known that this algebra is simple if and only if the dynamical system $(X,\alpha)$ is a minimal dynamical system, see corollary VIII.3.8 of page 229 of this book.

Is there a precise example of a dynamical system whose minimality is not easy to proof but the symplicity of corresponding algebra is accessible and easy to investigation?

Is there an example of a dynamical system with a finite number of minimal components whose number of minimal components can be precisely observed in the corresponding cross product algebra?

The number of minimal component of a dynamical system via certain invariants of corresponding cross product $C^*$ algebra, some precise examples

Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space and $\alpha$ be a homeomorphism of $X$.

So we have a natural action of $\mathbb{Z}$ on $C(X)$ which generates the cross product algebra $C^*(X,\alpha)$. This algebra is simple if and only if the dynamical system $(X,\alpha)$ is a minimal dynamical system

Is there a precise example of a dynamical system whose minimality is not easy to proof but the symplicity of corresponding algebra is accessible and easy to investigation?

Is there an example of a dynamical system with a finite number of minimal components whose number of minimal components can be precisely observed in the corresponding cross product algebra?

The number of minimal components of a dynamical system via certain invariants of corresponding cross product $C^*$ algebra, some precise examples

Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space and $\alpha$ be a homeomorphism of $X$.

So we have a natural action of $\mathbb{Z}$ on $C(X)$ which generates the cross product algebra $C^*(X,\alpha)$. It is well known that this algebra is simple if and only if the dynamical system $(X,\alpha)$ is a minimal dynamical system, see corollary VIII.3.8 of page 229 of this book.

Is there a precise example of a dynamical system whose minimality is not easy to proof but the symplicity of corresponding algebra is accessible and easy to investigation?

Is there an example of a dynamical system with a finite number of minimal components whose number of minimal components can be precisely observed in the corresponding cross product algebra?

Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading