Skip to main content
Rollback to Revision 2
Source Link
Mikhail Borovoi
  • 14.1k
  • 2
  • 31
  • 71

Intersection of connected reductiveLevi subgroups via intersection of their Weyl groups

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over $\mathbb{C}$. We fix a maximal torus $T \subset G$. Let $M,L \subset G$ be two connected reductiveits Levi subgroups containing $T$ (note that we do note assume that $M,L$ are standard with respect to the same Borel subgroup). Let $\Delta$ be the root systemset of $G$ with respect toroots of $T$,$(G,T)$ and let $W$ denoteis the corresponding Weyl group. Let $\Delta_M,\Delta_L\subset \Delta$ be the root systemsroots of $M,L$, respectively (again with respect to $T$), and let $W_M,W_L\subset W$ denoteare their Weyl groups. Assume that $\Delta_M\cap \Delta_L=\varnothing$;, does this imply that $W_M\cap W_L=\{1\}$?

Intersection of connected reductive subgroups via intersection of their Weyl groups

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over $\mathbb{C}$. We fix a maximal torus $T \subset G$. Let $M,L \subset G$ be two connected reductive subgroups containing $T$. Let $\Delta$ be the root system of $G$ with respect to $T$, and let $W$ denote the corresponding Weyl group. Let $\Delta_M,\Delta_L\subset \Delta$ be the root systems of $M,L$, respectively (again with respect to $T$), and let $W_M,W_L\subset W$ denote their Weyl groups. Assume that $\Delta_M\cap \Delta_L=\varnothing$; does this imply that $W_M\cap W_L=\{1\}$?

Intersection of Levi subgroups via intersection of their Weyl groups

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over $\mathbb{C}$. We fix a maximal torus $T \subset G$. Let $M,L \subset G$ be its Levi subgroups containing $T$ (note that we do note assume that $M,L$ are standard with respect to the same Borel subgroup). Let $\Delta$ be the set of roots of $(G,T)$ and $W$ is the corresponding Weyl group. Let $\Delta_M,\Delta_L\subset \Delta$ be the roots of $M,L$ respectively, $W_M,W_L\subset W$ are their Weyl groups. Assume that $\Delta_M\cap \Delta_L=\varnothing$, does this imply that $W_M\cap W_L=\{1\}$?

Title corrected
Link
Mikhail Borovoi
  • 14.1k
  • 2
  • 31
  • 71

Intersection of Leviconnected reductive subgroups via intersection of their Weyl groups

Assumptions rewritten in order to make them clearer.
Source Link
Mikhail Borovoi
  • 14.1k
  • 2
  • 31
  • 71

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over $\mathbb{C}$. We fix a maximal torus $T \subset G$. Let $M,L \subset G$ be its Levitwo connected reductive subgroups containing $T$ (note that we do note assume that $M,L$ are standard with respect to the same Borel subgroup). Let $\Delta$ be the set of rootsroot system of $(G,T)$$G$ with respect to $T$, and let $W$ isdenote the corresponding Weyl group. Let $\Delta_M,\Delta_L\subset \Delta$ be the rootsroot systems of $M,L$ respectively, respectively (again with respect to $T$), and let $W_M,W_L\subset W$ aredenote their Weyl groups. Assume that $\Delta_M\cap \Delta_L=\varnothing$,; does this imply that $W_M\cap W_L=\{1\}$?

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over $\mathbb{C}$. We fix a maximal torus $T \subset G$. Let $M,L \subset G$ be its Levi subgroups containing $T$ (note that we do note assume that $M,L$ are standard with respect to the same Borel subgroup). Let $\Delta$ be the set of roots of $(G,T)$ and $W$ is the corresponding Weyl group. Let $\Delta_M,\Delta_L\subset \Delta$ be the roots of $M,L$ respectively, $W_M,W_L\subset W$ are their Weyl groups. Assume that $\Delta_M\cap \Delta_L=\varnothing$, does this imply that $W_M\cap W_L=\{1\}$?

Let $G$ be a connected reductive group over $\mathbb{C}$. We fix a maximal torus $T \subset G$. Let $M,L \subset G$ be two connected reductive subgroups containing $T$. Let $\Delta$ be the root system of $G$ with respect to $T$, and let $W$ denote the corresponding Weyl group. Let $\Delta_M,\Delta_L\subset \Delta$ be the root systems of $M,L$, respectively (again with respect to $T$), and let $W_M,W_L\subset W$ denote their Weyl groups. Assume that $\Delta_M\cap \Delta_L=\varnothing$; does this imply that $W_M\cap W_L=\{1\}$?

deleted 6 characters in body
Source Link
Asav
  • 163
  • 5
Loading
Source Link
Asav
  • 163
  • 5
Loading