Skip to main content

Timeline for Erdos-Kac for sum of divisors

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

3 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 30, 2010 at 13:17 comment added Kevin O'Bryant The number 2 is historically important, but plays no essential role in the proof of the upper and lower bounds. That is, for any particular $x$, the same method (and a nontrivial amount of computation) gives upper and lower bounds that agree out to a digit or two.
Jul 30, 2010 at 3:51 comment added Steven Oh I see. So for $x=2$, there are already upper and lower bounds. I will Will Jagy's references and see what I can do for $x \neq 2$. Thanks for the links.
Jul 29, 2010 at 13:02 history answered Kevin O'Bryant CC BY-SA 2.5