Timeline for Does every positive-definite integral lattice admit an angle-preserving homomorphism into $\Bbb Z^n$ for some $n$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2019 at 23:37 | history | edited | Ian Agol | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1592 characters in body
|
| Aug 6, 2019 at 16:41 | history | edited | Ian Agol | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 893 characters in body
|
| Aug 6, 2019 at 16:30 | history | edited | Ian Agol | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 895 characters in body
|
| Aug 6, 2019 at 7:12 | comment | added | Ian Agol | @M.Winter: right, I don't think these lattices will be saturated. I guess I misunderstood your definition of sublattice (as you say, your terminology is nonstandard). | |
| Aug 6, 2019 at 6:46 | comment | added | M. Winter | Am I correct that this embedding gives a sublattice of $\Bbb Z^n$ which is not necessarily saturated? That would be okay, as I explained in a comment to my question, but I should (and want to) edit the question to make this more clear. | |
| Aug 6, 2019 at 5:25 | vote | accept | M. Winter | ||
| Aug 5, 2019 at 18:51 | history | answered | Ian Agol | CC BY-SA 4.0 |