Timeline for Simplify Wasserstein distance between Gaussians with binary cost function
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2020 at 18:36 | vote | accept | dohmatob | ||
| Aug 4, 2019 at 16:02 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| Jul 31, 2019 at 10:42 | comment | added | dohmatob | Thanks :). In the meanwhile, I'd come up with a somewhat synthetic solution to a generalization of the second part of my original question. See post below. Would like to know what you think. N.B.: It's possible my answer has a loophole due to an unjustified step (b). | |
| Jul 31, 2019 at 9:09 | comment | added | Mateusz Kwaśnicki | @dohmatob: I have just edited in some intuitions. The idea is quite simple, I think I rather failed to describe it clearly then. | |
| Jul 31, 2019 at 9:07 | history | edited | Mateusz Kwaśnicki | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 880 characters in body
|
| Jul 31, 2019 at 8:56 | comment | added | dohmatob | Thanks. Please could you explain the intuition behind the construction of your coupling $\gamma$ ? I really looks mysterious. | |
| Jul 30, 2019 at 21:06 | history | answered | Mateusz Kwaśnicki | CC BY-SA 4.0 |