Let $T$ be a strong tournament, and let $N=v_1v_2 \cdots v_n$ be an enumeration of $V(T)$. Let $C$ be a circuit in $T$. We define $i_N(C)=|\{(v_i,v_j) \in E(C); i>j\}|$. Suppose that $N$ is chosen in such a way that $i_N(C_1)+ \cdots + i_N(C_t)$ is minimum, where $C_1, \cdots, C_t$ are all the circuits of $T$.
Prove that $\forall i$ such that $1 \le i \le n-1$, $(v_i,v_{i+1}) \in E(T)$ and that $(v_n,v_1) \in E(T)$.
My attempt:
I already proved that $\forall i$ such that $1 \le i \le n-1$ we have $(v_i,v_{i+1})\in E(T)$.
I first assumed that $(v_i,v_{i+1}) \not \in E(T)$, and this gives that $(v_{i+1},v_{i})\in E(T)$, so I took the enumeration $N'=v_1 \cdots v_{i-1}v_{i+1}v_iv_{i+2} \cdots v_n$, and proved that $i_{N'}(C_1)+ \cdots + i_{N'}(C_t)< i_N(C_1)+ \cdots + i_N(C_t)$, which is a contradiction.
But for proving $(v_n,v_1) \in E(T)$ I supposed that $(v_1,v_n) \in E(T)$ and tried to take the enumeration $N''=v_nv_1\cdots v_{n-1}$ but I was notwasn't able to get to a contradiction. Maybe I better take another, since to get to a contradiction from this enumeration or something.
I am stuck and I don't know howmust be sure that the number of forward edges going to start$v_n$ was less than that of the backward edges from $v_n$ in the first enumeration, can anyone figure outI prove this?Or do I take 2 cases if the solutionnumber of forward edges was less or more than that of the backward edges? Or is there another enumeration that can finish it?
Please I want help in this one, I really need it so much. Thanksand thanks in advance.