Timeline for maximal unramified extension of Breuil ring in $A_{cris}$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 22, 2021 at 15:50 | comment | added | MAS | @SashaP, Thanks a lot. Second, ofcourse this argument is not used in your answer but somehow I thought about it and so asked. Thanks again | |
Jan 22, 2021 at 15:49 | comment | added | SashaP | @M.A.SARKAR An element of a $p$-adically complete ring $A$ is invertible if and only if its reduction in $A/p$ is invertible. In this case the reduction is a field so the claim is true because the mod $p$ reduction of $E(u)$ is non-zero, | |
Jan 22, 2021 at 15:46 | comment | added | MAS | @SashaP, sorry I meant to say $E(u)$ is unit in $\widehat{W(k)[[u]][\frac{1}{u}]}$. How to show it ? | |
Jan 22, 2021 at 15:34 | comment | added | SashaP | @M.A.SARKAR This is not true: if $E(u)$ was invertible in $W(k)[[u]][\frac{1}{u}]$ there would be an element $f(u)\in W(k)[[u]]$ that is not divisible by $u$ such that $f(u)E(u)=u^n$ for some $n'\geq 0$. This gives a contradiction by plugging in $u=0$. Do you think this fact is used in the above argument? | |
Jan 22, 2021 at 14:02 | comment | added | MAS | How to show $E(u)$ is invertible in $W(k)[[u]][\frac{1}{u}]$ ? | |
Jul 27, 2019 at 22:23 | comment | added | quasi-mathematician | Thanks so much both for correcting my wrong question and giving the right answer! | |
Jul 27, 2019 at 22:18 | vote | accept | quasi-mathematician | ||
Jul 26, 2019 at 18:31 | history | answered | SashaP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |