Timeline for Ideals in the ring of single-variable Laurent polynomials with integer coefficients
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2016 at 5:32 | comment | added | Luc Guyot | Do you need to assume that $G$ is finitely generated? | |
| S Jul 18, 2016 at 22:08 | history | suggested | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor notational changes: added missing \mathbb command, missing parenthesis; favoured t^{\pm 1} over t^{\pm}
|
| Jul 18, 2016 at 21:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 18, 2016 at 22:08 | |||||
| Jul 28, 2010 at 21:29 | vote | accept | Ryan Budney | ||
| Jul 28, 2010 at 20:27 | answer | added | Bill Dubuque | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 18:37 | answer | added | Robin Chapman | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 18:33 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | I suppose they could help when dealing with the subgroup $\tau G$. | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 18:20 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | Can Grobner bases be adapted to work in this setting? | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 18:10 | history | edited | Ryan Budney | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
put forward a vague proposal - hoping for better responses
|
| Jul 28, 2010 at 17:30 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | Equality is my main concern. But inclusion would be nice to know, too. The ideals are given by a finite number of generators. | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 17:29 | history | edited | Ryan Budney | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
update to reflect Martin's questions
|
| Jul 28, 2010 at 17:26 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | What do you mean by comparing? Testing of equality or inclusion? In that case it might be useful that this can be tested via their interesections with Z[t]. In which form are the ideals given? | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 17:17 | history | asked | Ryan Budney | CC BY-SA 2.5 |